Recordings now available

2023 Administrative Law & Governance Colloquium: “The Legitimacy of the State”

Comments

New Paper — A Defence of Administrative Law Doctrine

Comments

Recordings from the Administrative Law & Governance Colloquium 2022, “Artificial Administration: Automation, Digitization and Artificial Intelligence in Public Administration”

Comments

The Canadian Launch of Understanding Administrative Law in the Common Law World: January 26, 11.30 EST

Comments

Now Out: Administrative Law in Context 4th ed (Emond Montgomery, Toronto, 2021)

Comments

Understanding Administrative Law in the Common Law World

Comments

Administrative Law & Governance Colloquium 2021: Front-Line Administration (Free Registration Now Open)

Comments

Administrative Law in Ireland, 5th edition

Radio / Podcast

Dr. Paul Daly: The Administrative Law Trilogy

Seminars with Dean Knight, Gillian Metzger, Matthew Lewans, Sarah Nason and Alison Young

Administrative Law & Governance Colloquium 2020: Key Concepts in Public Law

Comments

Apex Courts and the Common Law

Leading public lawyers on the Privacy International litigation

Privacy International Blog Symposium

Administrative Law Matters

Comments

The Charter in Administrative Decision-Making: Defending the Duty to Take Charter Values (or Purposes) Into Account

On the evergreen topic of Charter values, I have a new paper on SSRN (forthcoming in a special edition of the Ottawa Law Review on language rights), entitled “The Charter in Administrative Decision-Making: Defending the Duty to Take Charter Values (or Purposes) into Account“: The Supreme Court of Canada recently reaffirmed that administrative decision-makers are […] Read more

Comments

The Public/Private Divide in Canada: Khorsand v. Toronto Police Services Board, 2024 ONCA 597 and Nova Scotia Health Authority v. Finkle and West, 2024 NSCA 87

In its 2018 decision in Highwood Congregation of Jehovah’s Witnesses (Judicial Committee) v. Wall, 2018 SCC 26, [2018] 1 SCR 750, the Supreme Court of Canada sought to clarify the approach to the scope of judicial review. Rowe J wrote, for a unanimous court, that “[j]udicial review is only available where there is an exercise […] Read more

Comments

Has Reasonableness Review Become Even More Robust? Piché c. Entreprises Y. Bouchard & Fils inc., 2024 QCCA 1374

In a post earlier this year analyzing the Supreme Court of Canada’s recent administrative law decisions, I noted how it would be “necessary to read the next entries in the standard-of-review catalogue very carefully to see if the Court is sending a signal about the level of intensity of reasonableness review under the Vavilov framework”. […] Read more

Twitter